Nepal is going through one of its most turbulent political moments in years. Massive protests, mostly led by young people, have rocked the country. The spark was a short-lived ban on social media, but deeper anger about corruption, inequality, and lack of opportunity has been building for some time. The Washington Post+4Politico+4AP News+4
What Happened
- Prime Minister K.P. Sharma Oli resigned on September 9, 2025, after protests turned deadly. AP News+3Financial Times+3AP News+3
- Before that, the government had imposed a ban on multiple social media platforms. The ban was rapidly reversed amid public outrage. AP News+2Reuters+2
- The protests escalated: people set fire to government buildings (parliament, supreme court), damaged political elite’s homes, blocked roads; over 30 people have been reported dead and hundreds injured. Reuters+3AP News+3The Times of India+3
Current Situation
- Transitional Power: Oli is now a caretaker prime minister. There is strong pressure for an interim government. One likely candidate is Sushila Karki, a former Chief Justice. She is expected to be appointed to hold things steady while new elections or reforms are arranged. Reuters+1
- Army Involvement: The Nepal Army has moved in to help restore order in many parts of the capital, applying curfews and helping with security. AP News+1
- Uncertainty Remains: Many roads blocked, shops shut, and public fear remains. There is also uncertainty about who will lead next, what reforms will happen, and whether protesters’ demands (anti-corruption, free social media, more youth opportunities) will be met. Reuters+2AP News+2
Why This Matters
- These events show how frustrated citizens (especially young people) are with perceived corruption and inequality. When basic freedoms (like social media access) are threatened, it can quickly provoke widespread anger. Reuters+2The Washington Post+2
- The stability of Nepal’s government, already fragile, is very much in question. The country has had many governments since the end of monarchy (in 2008), and often political change comes through protests rather than elections. Wikipedia+2The Washington Post+2
- The role of the army is sensitive. While many see it as helping bring stability, there’s risk if it becomes too involved in governance rather than just maintaining order. AP News+1
What to Watch Going Forward
- Who becomes interim prime minister, and whether they are acceptable to protesters.
- If there will be any genuine reforms (e.g., anti-corruption measures, social media freedoms, economic relief for youth).
- Whether order returns to Kathmandu and other cities without further violence.
- How neighboring countries and international bodies respond.
Nepal’s situation is still evolving quickly. What began as a fight over social media has become a broader demand for change — change in politics, leadership, and social justice. The next few days and weeks will be crucial in determining what kind of path Nepal takes next.
Leave a Reply